1st Issue June 2006

Work Choices begins...

As you will have read or heard, the Federal Government has confirmed that its industrial relations reforms arising from the Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act 2005 (the Act) took effect on Monday, 27 March 2006.

Further to this, the Federal Government has also released the much anticipated Regulations which accompany the Act and provide practical guidance as to its interpretation and implementation.

Some of the key issues addressed by the Regulations were outlined in the March issue of our Employment Briefly (Issue no. 38).

Current coverage

What happened on Monday 27 March 2006?

Federal award

  1. Continues to apply in current form
  2. Provisions relating to jury service, notice of termination and long service leave can not be varied
  3. Provisions relating to superannuation may not be varied, continue only to 30 June 2008
  4. Wages set by Australian Fair Pay Commission (AFPC)
  5. Annual leave, personal leave and parental leave removed unless “more generous” than the Standard

Federal certified
agreement (Division 2 or Division 3)

  1. Continues to apply in current form
  2. Retains nominal expiry date

State award

  1. Becomes a “Notional Agreement Preserving State Award”
  2. Continues to apply
  3. Content which is deemed to be “prohibited” is automatically void
  4. Content will be assessed using the “more favourable” test against the Standard
  5. Remaining content becomes federally enforceable
  6. Three-year nominal expiry date

State enterprise
agreement

  1. “Preserved Collective State Agreement”
  2. Content which is deemed to be “prohibited” is automatically void
  3. Remaining content becomes federally enforceable
  4. Retains nominal expiry date

Award free

  1. No change

Federal award

  1. Allowable matters continue to apply
  2. Content with respect to superannuation continues until 30 June 2008
  3. AIRC may vary wages or allowances having regard to decision of the AFPC

Federal certified
agreement (Div 3)

  1. “Transitional agreement”
  2. Five-year nominal expiry date

State award

  1. No change
  2. State system continues to apply

State enterprise
agreement

  1. No change
  2. State system continues to apply

Award free

  1. No change

 

Ian Colgrave
PARTNER
Direct Line: (08) 8210 1203
e-mail: icolgrave@normans.com.au

Ian Colgrave is a leading advisor in the
Employment team at Norman Waterhouse,
on industrial relations and employment law issues.

 

Bribery of Foreign Public Officials

The Cole Inquiry has drawn public attention to a provision of the Criminal Code Act that makes it an offence to bribe a foreign public official.

Section 70.2(1) provides:

(1) A person is guilty of an offence if:

(a) the person:

    (i) provides a benefit to another person; or

    (ii) causes a benefit to be provided to another person; or

    (iii) offers to provide, or promises to provide, a benefit to another person; or

    (iv) causes an offer of the provision of a  benefit, or a promise of the provision

       of a benefit, to be made to another person; and

(b) the benefit is not legitimately due to the other person; and

(c) the first-mentioned person does so with the intention of influencing a foreign public
    official (who may be the other person) in the exercise of the official’s duties
    as a foreign public official in order to:

    (i) obtain or retain business; or

   (ii) obtain or retain a business advantage that is not legitimately due to the recipient,
    or intended recipient, of the business advantage (who may be the
    first-mentioned person).

Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.

This offence was introduced in 1999 as a result of Australia’s ratification of the Convention of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions.

Some features of this legislation:

  • it applies only to the bribing of “foreign public officials” although that term is defined broadly by the legislation;
  • the bribery need not be in the form of money nor is it limited to property;
  • the offence has extra territorial effect (the offence may be committed wholly outside Australia by an Australian citizen, resident or company);
  • although there are defences they are limited and it is anticipated that they will “apply very rarely” (see the Australian Guidelines).

Further information is available from the Australian Government Attorney-General’s website at: http://www.ag.gov.au/foreignbribery

(Australian Guidelines are available via a link at the bottom of that page).

A notable feature of the legislation is that it applies to companies as well as individuals. A company can be found guilty of this offence if it can be shown that the company "expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorised or permitted the offence" (Section 12.3(1) of the Criminal Code Act). Such authorisation or permission can be established by showing that the board of directors knowingly or recklessly authorised the commission of the offence but it can also be established in other ways including:

“proving that a corporate culture existed within the body corporate that directed, encouraged, tolerated or led to non-compliance with the relevant provision”

or

“proving that the body corporate failed to create and maintain a corporate culture that required compliance with the relevant provision”

(section 12.3 (c) and (d)).

The Australian Guidelines no doubt having regard to those provisions states:

“Companies must ensure they have in place a corporate policy of compliance with the law. Further, companies must exercise due diligence and take reasonable precautions to ensure that their employees do not commit foreign bribery offences.”

While there have been no prosecutions under Section 70.2 to date there are likely to be prosecutions in coming months.

Bill Morrow
SPECIAL COUNSEL
Direct Line: (08) 8210 1212
e-mail:bmorrow@normans.com.au

Bill Morrow, Special Counsel in the
Communication, Media and Technology
team has practised intellectual
property law since 1979 and information technology
law since 1983.

 

Wills

A Will is a legal document that expresses your wishes as to what is to happen to your property after your death.  It may also contain directions about other matters such as guardianship of minor children and funeral arrangements.

Why do you need a Will?
If you die without having made a Will you’ll be ‘intestate’ and your estate will be distributed according to a formula set by law.  That could result in some of your dependants not being provided for adequately or in the way you would have wanted. It could also mean that people you would have included will miss out, or people you would have left out will benefit. 

Someone may be appointed to administer your estate, and that may not be the person you would have chosen. 

In almost every case, being intestate will mean your estate will take longer, and be more expensive, to administer.  This may cause unnecessary hardship for your loved ones and will almost certainly mean there is less of your estate for them to benefit from.

Who should prepare your Will, and what about those ‘home made legal Will Kits’?
There are now many ‘Will Kits’ available for purchase.  Will Kits vary enormously in quality, and even the ‘better’ ones can lead to many problems when they are used by people with no legal training or background.  For example, words such as “equally” or “absolutely” may have unintentional and undesired effects if they are incorrectly used.

Furthermore, Will Kits seldom adequately address (or address at all) the additional provisions required in more complex situations, such as situations involving blended families, children with problems (eg mental disabilities, addictions etc), dependant elderly parents, family trusts, companies, businesses and so on. 

Poorly drafted Wills can give rise to many problems.  You may be left ‘partially intestate’ (part of your estate is not disposed of) or your beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries may fight over how much, or what, they will receive from your estate.  Disputes over the interpretation of a Will can cost an estate (and ultimately the beneficiaries of the estate) thousands of dollars.

It can cost far more to obtain probate (legally validating the Will) for a Will that does not comply with the necessary formalities. 

It is therefore important to have your Will prepared by a lawyer who is experienced in drafting Wills.  This is because an experienced Wills lawyer knows the many legal requirements and the correct legal terminology necessary to ensure your Will is drafted in accordance with the legal requirements.  An experienced Wills lawyer will also be able to give you practical and unbiased advice on the options available for your particular circumstances to then draft a Will to suit you. 

In short, preparing your Will with the aid of a lawyer experienced in drafting Wills is the best way to ensure that, upon your death, your assets are distributed as you wish and your family and other loved ones are provided for in the way you intended with the minimum of cost, conflict and stress to them.

If you already have a Will - when and how often should you review and update it?
This depends on your individual circumstances.  You should definitely review your Will if any of the following happens or has happened:

  • you marry, or divorce or separate from your spouse; 
  • you enter into, or end, a de facto relationship;
  • you have another child, or adopt or foster a child;
  • your financial circumstances change significantly;
  • an executor dies or becomes unwilling or unable to act as executor for any reason;
  • a beneficiary (someone who has been left something in the Will) dies; or
  • you have specifically left any property which you later sell or give away or put into a trust or partnership or which changes its character.  For example, sometimes shares in a company are given to a beneficiary and the company later restructures its share capital so that the shares gifted no longer exist.

If any of these events happen or have happened to you, contact one of our experienced Wills lawyers who will be able to advise you whether you need to update your Will.  Our team at Norman Waterhouse has a wealth of experience to assist you in any aspect of Wills and Advance Directives (ie Enduring Powers of Attorney, Enduring Powers of Guardianship, Medical Powers of Attorney and Anticipatory Directions), Probate and Deceased Estate Administration and Estate Planning.

Norman Waterhouse also offers a convenient Home Visit Service for Wills and Advance Directives (at fixed fees for straightforward matters).  A mobile Wills consultant from Norman Waterhouse can visit you in the comfort and privacy of your own home at a time convenient to you to discuss these important documents.

Katrina Nitschke
ASSOCIATE
Direct Line: (08) 8210 1232
e-mail: knitschke@normans.com.au 

Katrina Nitschke practices both in our
Business Services Team and our
Wills and Estates Team.

 

 

 

Liability following Assignment of Leases

Vendors of businesses and directors of vendor companies must always consider liability following assignment of any lease.

Many sales of businesses include the assignment of an existing lease by the vendor as the outgoing lessee (“assignor”) to the purchaser as the incoming lessee (“assignee”). If the lease of business premises is a lease regulated by the Retail and Commercial Leases Act (SA 1995) (“Act”) then the liability to the landlord of both the assignor and any guarantor of the assignor may, in the absence of any contrary agreement, be determined by the Act.

Section 45A of the Act provides that despite any provision of a lease, if a lease that is to continue as an ongoing business is assigned then the assignor and any guarantor will not be subject to any obligation of the lease on or after the “relevant date” provided that:

  • The assignor provides an assignor’s disclosure statement to the assignee before the lessor’s consent to the proposed agreement is requested; and
  • The assignor provides an assignor’s disclosure statement to the landlord at the time the request for consent is made.

Assuming there are no other more favourable release arrangements agreed under the lease terms, if the required process is followed the liability of the assignor and any guarantor of the assignor will end on the “relevant date” being the first to occur of:

  • The second anniversary of the date on which the lease was assigned;
  • The date upon which the lease expires; or
  • If the lease is renewed or extended after assignment, the date on which the renewal or extension commences.

When considering any assignment of a lease regulated by the Act as a part of a sale of an ongoing business the residual liability of the vendor (and the directors of the vendor company) must be considered before approaching the lessor for consent.

These conditions initially include determining:

  • Whether the Act applies to the leased business premises; and
  • What the terms of the existing lease provide in relation to liability post assignment.

Failure to consider these issues may mean that the benefit of the Act (assuming the lease terms are less favourable than the Act) will not be available to a vendor and liability for the vendor and its directors may continue for the term of the lease (including renewal terms).

If you require help in this area or would like more information,
please feel free to contact:

James McEwen
SENIOR ASSOCIATE
Direct Line: (08) 8210 1276
jmcewen@normans.com.au 

James McEwen has worked as a commercial
property lawyer in the Northern Territory and South Australia
for over 5 years.  His experience includes the management
and conduct of a wide range of property and commercial
matters for a cross section of business and industry,
including financial institutions in both the private and public sectors.

 

New Appointments:

Norman Waterhouse is experiencing a substantial period of growth and as such, a number of new appointments have occurred since the beginning of the year.

Paul Barrington joined Norman Waterhouse as Chief Executive in April 2006. Prior to this Paul held a number of senior general and financial management positions in a range of professional services organisations, including financial services, commercial law, intellectual property and professional membership.  Before taking up a career as a professional manager Paul practiced as a Chartered Accountant including six years at partner level in a mid-tier national firm during which time he established and developed an overseas office. In his eighteen years with professional services organisations, Paul has been instrumental in driving and managing positive change and in overseeing the development of strategic plans, business plans and budgets.  He has also been responsible for day-to day management of key operational support functions such as marketing and business development, human resources, financial and management accounting and reporting, information technology and risk management.

Tim Griffin joined the firm’s Local Government team in March 2006 where he specialises in local government regulation and compliance. Tim has approximately 20 years experience in law enforcement as an investigator, policy advisor and prosecutor.  He possesses a sound knowledge of regulatory procedure and is available to provide advice and training on a broad range of regulatory and compliance issues. Prior to joining Norman Waterhouse he was extensively involved in the administration of the Environment Protection Act and other natural resource legislation. Tim draws on a wealth of experience and knowledge in the fields of regulatory procedure and environmental law and believes in providing practical solutions to compliance problems.

Andrew Craig joined the Property, Infrastructure and Development team as an Associate on Monday 10 April.  Prior to joining Norman Waterhouse, Andrew worked as a solicitor in New South Wales for over four years in a wide variety of areas including property development, building and construction, mining, commercial litigation and environmental law.  Andrew has acted extensively for both private sector clients and public sector clients and his areas of speciality include infrastructure and development agreements, building and construction contracts, property transactions, general contract and commercial advice.

David Billington commenced with the firm in its Planning and Environment team as an Associate on May 1.  He was previously an Associate to Justice Debelle of the Supreme Court of South Australia.  In his time with the president of the Land and Valuation Division of the Court, David was involved with many environment and development matters.  David brings first-hand knowledge of the processes and procedure of the Court to the firm.  Prior to that David spent 15 months with a boutique law firm working on a wide variety of matters including property, energy & resources, trade practices, commercial litigation, health law and intellectual property matters.

Ryan Beers joined Norman Waterhouse in January 2006 as part of the Property, Infrastructure & Development team. Prior to commencing with Norman Waterhouse, Ryan spent over three years working and studying in China and speaks fluent Mandarin Chinese. Much of Ryan’s time in China was spent working at the Australian Embassy in Beijing for the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs. Ryan advises in a broad range of areas, both corporate and property related, including commercial and contract management. Ryan is also part of the International Business Team, and advises foreign investors on a broad range of legal issues.

Rebecca McAulay joined the Norman Waterhouse Planning and Environment team as a solicitor in February 2006 having previously gained two years legal experience at a middle tier firm in Adelaide. Her areas of specialty include urban and regional planning, environment, building, native title, water resources and native vegetation law. At Norman Waterhouse, she works closely with the Environment and Planning team in the preparation of Planning Appeals in the Environment, Resources and Development Court, assists in the preparation of Land Management Agreements and enforcement notices under the Development Act 1993 and preparation of advices relating to the Development Act 1993.

Corna Kotzé commenced at the firm on Monday 3 April as a Solicitor in the Property, Infrastructure and Development team, and has had experience as a property lawyer in South Africa for over 10 years. She acted for private developers and as in-house counsel for local government. She was also admitted as a conveyancer and notary. Corna’s 8 years with the City Council of Pretoria (now known as Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality, the second largest municipality in South Africa) afforded her the opportunity to be part of numerous commercial and residential developments, which include Menlyn, Brooklyn, and Hillcrest shopping centres and the Innovation Hub.

 

 

Corporate Responsibility

Flavour SA

Norman Waterhouse is proud to be a Supporting Sponsor of Flavour South Australia, the Food Industry Association Incorporated. Flavour SA is a food industry association that supports and enhances food producers in South Australia. Its membership base varies from large food producers to small and start-up producers. By providing its members with a range of services, Flavour SA is committed to the growth and development of the food industry in South Australia.

Norman Waterhouse is proud to support Flavour SA through promotional material, sponsorship of events and hosting seminars on relevant and topical issues.

For more information relating to this or the Food Act in general please contact:

Sathish Dasan
PARTNER
Direct Line: (08) 8210 1253 or 0412 823 850
e-mail: sdasan@normans.com

Botanic Gardens

Norman Waterhouse is pleased to be part of the 150 year celebrations at the Adelaide Botanic Gardens. The firm made a donation which was acknowledged on a donor board in the vicinity of the Scholbugk Pavillion and on other appropriate signage. Our donation will assist in the preservation of the Scholbugk Pavillion, Amazon Waterfly Pavillion, the Mediterranean Garden, the Western Entrance and the Mount Lofty Multi-Purpose Facility. We are pleased to be supporting this venture which will continue to expand South Australia's heritage.

Bedford Industries

Norman Waterhouse is committed to several long term sponsorships with various deserving organisations and charities across South Australia and New South Wales. One in particular is Bedford Industries Pty Ltd of which, over and above our sponsorship agreement, Norman Waterhouse donated eleven tickets to each of the four shows of the Commonwealth Bank Police Tattoo to be held on the 5, 6, and 7th of May. We hope that the staff and other guests of Bedfords enjoyed the performances.

University of South Australia’s International Graduate School of Business
MBA Program

The University of South Australia offer students the opportunity to study their Master of Business Administration (MBA) program in four different ways. The four methods include the option to study in Adelaide, online, in a number of countries in Asia where the course is offered in Mandarin or English. The top students in each mode of study are awarded prizes for various aspects of the course, with Norman Waterhouse providing the top prize for Competitive Strategy. We are very pleased to be included in this program which is giving students the chance to further their business knowledge in Australia and overseas.

 

If you would like more information about Norman Waterhouse, please visit our website, www.normans.com.au